Thomson, P 2002, ‘
Vicki and Thanh’,
Schooling
the rustbelt kids: making the difference in changing times, Allen
& Unwin, Crows Nest, NSW, pp. 1–18.
This
reading had an important term that I was originally introduced to in my
Humanities unit. Rather than give another summary, I will provide a paragraph
from my essay based on the unit where these readings come from (Creating
Effective Learning Environments: Primary) as I feel it best describes virtual
schoolbags and how they contribute to the creation of an effective learning
environment.
Effective
learning environments take students’ interests into consideration, so all
students are engaged and included in the classroom. In my opinion, virtual
schoolbags is an important term for teachers to be aware of. A virtual
schoolbag holds ‘…things they have already learned at home, with their friends,
and in and from the world in which they live’ (Thomson 2002, p.1). For students
to have sustained interest, I feel that teachers must elicit the contents of
every virtual schoolbag. To do so, they must ‘…take the time to get to know
each of their students’ (Smith, Danforth & Nice 2005, p.88). Reflecting on
my teaching rounds, the most effective way to get to know students is by
talking to them, to draw out their interests and elicit their prior
understandings. Munns et al. (2012, p.173) discusses Sonia, a teacher who
ensures her teaching draws on students’ funds of knowledge. By drawing on the
funds of knowledge and the contents of students’ virtual schoolbags, teachers
can ensure they meet the Melbourne Declaration Goal of successful learning,
because all students will be engaged, as what they are doing will resonate with
them. Principle three of the Principles of Learning and Teaching (PoLT) states
‘Students' needs, backgrounds, perspectives and interests are reflected in the
learning program’ (DEECD 2012). If teachers do not reflect the interests of
students in the classroom, it will be impossible for students to learn
effectively, as students will be disengaged, they will feel ostracised and
consider themselves as not belonging. Therefore, extracting the contents of
virtual schoolbags and using it in the classroom is vital. In addition, being
aware of the Kounin model of management is important to engagement, where
teachers ensure students’ engagement levels are high. By drawing on students’
virtual schoolbags, it will enable classroom environments to be highly engaging
and enable successful learning for all students, as the Kounin model aims to
prevent misbehaviour which could impact on the successful learning of others.
Likewise, teachers must also be mindful of what they communicate. Mackay
discusses how people only actively listen to ‘…things which are relevant to
their own situation, their own needs, their own interests…’ (Mackay 1998, p.10).
Consequently, teachers must be mindful of what they communicate so it is
relevant to students, in construction of a learning environment that is
supportive, engaging, stimulating and relevant for successful learning, as well
as enabling students to feel as if they belong to the classroom community.
- Implications on our teaching
with respect to virtual schoolbags
- Not all of the contents will be applicable to the classroom
environment
- Some students will be more beneficial than others – ‘The children
who are most often successful are those who already possess, by virtue of
who they are and where they come from, some of the cultural
capital that counts for school success (Thomson 2002, p.6).
·
Virtual schoolbags and funds of knowledge can be linked. Funds of knowledge is described as ‘...tools, strategies and activities
families engage in to live their lives’ (Hill 2012). Moll et al. (1992) describes
funds of knowledge as ‘…historically accumulated and culturally
developed bodies of knowledge and skills essential for household or individual
functioning and well-being’ (p.133). Teachers need to be aware of and make use of the funds of
knowledge or contents of one's virtual schoolbags in order for them to be
engaged in their learning. This is described in a paragraph from my essay
for this unit as provided above.
Additional references:
Department of Education and Early Childhood Development
2012, ‘PoLT Online Professional Learning Resource’, retrieved 5 April
2013, <http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/support/pages/polt.aspx?Redirect=1>.
Hill, S 2012 Developing early literacy: assessment and
teaching, 2nd edn, Eleanor Curtain, Prahran, Victoria.
Mackay, H 1998, ‘The injection myth’, The good listener: better
relationships through better communication, Pan Macmillan, Sydney, pp. 7–26.
Moll,
L, Amanti, C, Neff, D & Gonzalez, N 1992, ‘Funds of Knowledge for Teaching:
Using a Qualitative Approach to Connect Homes and Classrooms’, Theory Into Practice, vol. 31, no. 2,
pp. 132-141.
Munns, G, Arthur, L, Hertzberg, M, Sawyer, W & Zammit, K
2012, ‘A fair go for students in poverty: Australia’, in T Wrigley, P Thomson
& B Lingard (eds), Changing schools: alternative ways to make a world of
difference, Routledge, Abingdon, UK, pp. 167–80.
Smith, TJ, Danforth, S & Nice, S 2005, ‘Creating a participatory classroom community’, in S Danforth
& TJ Smith (eds), Engaging troubling students: a constructivist approach,
Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, California, pp. 57–91.
